I'd like to share some feedback about the way editors' statistics are represented to site owners receiving their edits.

I don't understand the statistics functionality yet, bwhen I go to one of my own sites and view an edit that I made (experimentally), it shows my avatar and says "DaveDomingo is correct 0% of the time." That is definitely not true, and it's not the way I want to be introduced to anyone, particularly a site owner whose confidence and gratitude I am hoping to earn.

For the statistics functionality in the above situation, I suggest having it show the number of edits that the editor has made, and (of those) the number that are pending, declined and accepted.

Editors aren't "correcting" site content, and site owners aren't judging whether the edits they receive are "correct." Editors are suggesting changes ("edits" is fine), and site owners are deciding whether they like the suggested changes enough to adopt them. Both sides of the conversation are subjective, so to correlate acceptance with "correctness" or "accuracy" is not fair to editors.

If the "accuracy"/"correct _% of the time" figure is the percentage of a person's total edits that are accepted, why not just call it their acceptance rate?

Thanks for soliciting feedback. Hope this is helpful.